- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W10 Pro LEP vs Seeker 4 IPX8
Acebeam W10 Pro LEP vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
What W10 Pro LEP does better (2) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Brightness & throw8.0
Why is W10 Pro LEP better than Seeker 4 IPX8?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,425 m vs 400 m3.6×
- RechargeableYes · Seeker 4 IPX8: No
Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than W10 Pro LEP?
- Maximum output750 lm vs 3,100 lm4.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 750 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 507,656 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,425 m | 400 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 4 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
