- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W20 LEP vs X30
Acebeam W20 LEP vs Acebeam X30
What W20 LEP does better (4) and where X30 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W20 LEPX30
| W20 LEP | X30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 115.1 mm | 159.7 mm | −44.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 52.5 mm | −20.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 46.8 mm | −21.4 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 474 g | −343 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W20 LEP better than X30?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,100 m vs 600 m+83%
- Peak beam intensity302,500 cd vs 90,000 cd3.4×
- Weight131 g vs 474 g3.6×
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 1 m+50%
Why is X30 better than W20 LEP?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 20,000 lm33.3×
- Maximum runtime1.3 h vs 87 h66.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 20,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 302,500 cd | 90,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,100 m | 600 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 80 min | — |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 850 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 1.3 h | 87 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 115.1 mm | 159.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 52.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 46.8 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 474 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
