- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W50 2.0 vs EDC27
Acebeam W50 2.0 vs Nitecore EDC27
What W50 2.0 does better (0) and where EDC27 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is W50 2.0 better than EDC27?
W50 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is EDC27 better than W50 2.0?
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 3,100 lm+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 23,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 305 m |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | — | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 20 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 216.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 84 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 79 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
