- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X30 vs HT32R
Acebeam X30 vs Fenix HT32R
What X30 does better (1) and where HT32R wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30HT32R
| X30 | HT32R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 159.7 mm | 164.8 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.5 mm | 61 mm | −8.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 46.8 mm | 28.5 mm | +18.3 mm |
| Weight | 474 g | 259 g | +215 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 better than HT32R?
- Maximum output20,000 lm vs 4,000 lm5×
Why is HT32R better than X30?
- Weight474 g vs 259 g+83%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)600 m vs 740 m+23%
- Peak beam intensity90,000 cd vs 136,900 cd+52%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 92.5 h+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 20,000 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 90,000 cd | 136,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 600 m | 740 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Luminus SFT-42R |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 4 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 92.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.7 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.5 mm | 61 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 46.8 mm | 28.5 mm |
| Weight | 474 g | 259 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
