- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X30 vs TK35R
Acebeam X30 vs Fenix TK35R
What X30 does better (1) and where TK35R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30TK35R
| X30 | TK35R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 159.7 mm | 154 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.5 mm | 43 mm | +9.5 mm |
| Weight | 474 g | 342 g | +132 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 better than TK35R?
- Maximum output20,000 lm vs 5,800 lm3.4×
Why is TK35R better than X30?
- Weight474 g vs 342 g+39%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 105 h+21%
- Peak beam intensity90,000 cd vs 93,020 cd+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 20,000 lm | 5,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 90,000 cd | 93,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 600 m | 610 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Luminus SFT-25R |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 4 |
| Colour temperature | — | 7,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 105 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.7 mm | 154 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.5 mm | 43 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 46.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 474 g | 342 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
