How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. X35 vs TAC7R

Acebeam X35 vs Ledlenser TAC7R

What X35 does better (3) and where TAC7R wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam X35
Acebeam · 2026X35
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $230
vs
Ledlenser TAC7R
Ledlenser · 2026TAC7R
8.3Score
1 advantage≈ $160
Higher score
8.3Brightness & throw6.7
2.7Build & durability7.8

Why is X35 better than TAC7R?

  1. Maximum output20,000 lm vs 3,200 lm6.2×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)458 m vs 369 m+24%
  3. Peak beam intensity52,440 cd vs 34,000 cd+54%

Why is TAC7R better than X35?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam X35Acebeam X35≈ $2306.7
Ledlenser TAC7RLedlenser TAC7R≈ $1608.3
Light output
Maximum output20,000 lm3,200 lm
Peak beam intensity52,440 cd34,000 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)458 m369 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP70—
LED makerCree—
Number of LEDs2—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime106 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx6IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height134.5 mm—
Weight481 g—
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
Strobe—Yes
Red light—Yes
Green / blue / RGB lightYesYes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare