- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs EDC27
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Nitecore EDC27
What X50 2.0 does better (3) and where EDC27 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than EDC27?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 3,100 lm14.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 305 m3.2×
- Peak beam intensity238,632 cd vs 23,260 cd10.3×
Why is EDC27 better than X50 2.0?
EDC27 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | 23,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 305 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 20 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 756 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Lockout | Yes | — |
