How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. X80GT 3 vs TAC7R

Acebeam X80GT 3 vs Ledlenser TAC7R

What X80GT 3 does better (3) and where TAC7R wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam X80GT 3
Acebeam · 2026X80GT 3
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $240
vs
Ledlenser TAC7R
Ledlenser · 2026TAC7R
8.3Score
0 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
8.3Brightness & throw6.7
3.8Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9

Why is X80GT 3 better than TAC7R?

  1. Maximum output30,000 lm vs 3,200 lm9.4×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)430 m vs 369 m+17%
  3. Peak beam intensity46,220 cd vs 34,000 cd+36%

Why is TAC7R better than X80GT 3?

TAC7R has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam X80GT 3Acebeam X80GT 3≈ $2408.0
Ledlenser TAC7RLedlenser TAC7R≈ $1608.3
Light output
Maximum output30,000 lm3,200 lm
Peak beam intensity46,220 cd34,000 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)430 m369 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterNichia 519A—
LED makerNichia—
Number of LEDs24—
Colour rendering (CRI)95—
Colour temperature6,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity3,000 mAh—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height128 mm—
Weight560 g—
Modes & features
Stepless (ramping) brightnessYes—
Strobe—Yes
Red lightYesYes
UV lightYes—
Green / blue / RGB light—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare