- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W vs BT-2238078
Ansmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W vs BASEtech BT-2238078
What 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W does better (1) and where BT-2238078 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Brightness & throw7.7
Why is 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W better than BT-2238078?
- Maximum output1,400 lm vs 900 lm+56%
Why is BT-2238078 better than 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W?
BT-2238078 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,400 lm | 900 lm |
| Light source | COB LED panel | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 7 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 368 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Ansmann 1600-0394 FL2500R 30WvsAnsmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W
vs
VARTA Indestructible F30 ProvsAnsmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W
vs
KS Tools knickbarvsAnsmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W
vs
Brennenstuhl LuxPremium THL 300vsAnsmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W
vs
Brennenstuhl PL 200 A 200ImvsAnsmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W
vs
Brennenstuhl Akku Werkstattleuchte WL 500 AvsAnsmann 1600-0235 FL2500R 10W

