- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 1600-0399 vs CREE T6 XML
Ansmann 1600-0399 vs Eaxus CREE T6 XML
What 1600-0399 does better (0) and where CREE T6 XML wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Brightness & throw6.5
2.1Battery & charging2.8
2.5Build & durability6.5
Why is 1600-0399 better than CREE T6 XML?
1600-0399 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is CREE T6 XML better than 1600-0399?
- Maximum output175 lm vs 1,000 lm5.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)19 m vs 500 m26.3×
- Maximum runtime6 h vs 8 h+33%
- RechargeableNo · 1600-0399: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 175 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 19 m | 500 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XM-L |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 6 h | 8 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 35 mm |
| Weight | — | 129 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
