- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 1600-0399 vs Columbo 100
Ansmann 1600-0399 vs NEBO Columbo 100
What 1600-0399 does better (2) and where Columbo 100 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Brightness & throw2.4
2.1Battery & charging2.1
2.5Build & durability4.8
Why is 1600-0399 better than Columbo 100?
- Maximum output175 lm vs 100 lm+75%
- Maximum runtime6 h vs 4.5 h+33%
Why is Columbo 100 better than 1600-0399?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)19 m vs 56 m2.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 175 lm | 100 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 19 m | 56 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 6 h | 4.5 h |
| Rechargeable | No | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 107 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 17 mm |
| Weight | — | 34 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Black |
