- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Daily Use 270B vs Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL
Ansmann Daily Use 270B vs Velamp Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL
What Daily Use 270B does better (0) and where Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Brightness & throw6.4
2.7Build & durability2.7
Why is Daily Use 270B better than Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL?
Daily Use 270B has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL better than Daily Use 270B?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)96 m vs 300 m3.1×
- RechargeableNo · Daily Use 270B: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 275 lm | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 96 m | 300 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 36 h | — |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Silver | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Ledlenser Kidbeam4 70vsAnsmann Daily Use 270B
vs
VARTA AluminiumvsAnsmann Daily Use 270B3.84.1
vs
RehKittz CreevsAnsmann Daily Use 270B4.84.1
vs
Energizer Hardcase Multi UsevsAnsmann Daily Use 270B
vs
Ledlenser Kidbeam4 70vsVelamp Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL
vs
RehKittz CreevsVelamp Akku-Handscheinwerfer IR 551 DL4.84.6
