How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. M100F vs WF05E Intrinsically Safe

Ansmann M100F vs Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe

What M100F does better (2) and where WF05E Intrinsically Safe wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Ansmann M100F
Ansmann · 2018M100F
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $30
vs
Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
2.6Brightness & throw2.3
2.7Build & durability9.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is M100F better than WF05E Intrinsically Safe?

  1. Maximum output115 lm vs 85 lm+35%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)70 m vs 54 m+30%

Why is WF05E Intrinsically Safe better than M100F?

  1. Maximum runtime5 h vs 80 h16×
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications

Side by side

Ansmann M100FAnsmann M100F≈ $303.7
Light output
Maximum output115 lm85 lm
Peak beam intensity—730 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)70 m54 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitter—Cree XP-G2
LED maker—Cree
Number of LEDs1—
Battery & charging
BatteryAAAAA
Number of batteries1—
Maximum runtime5 h80 h
RechargeableNo—
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Body materialAluminium—
Pocket clipYesYes
Size & weight
Length / height—134.5 mm
Head diameter / width—19 mm
Body diameter / depth—14.9 mm
Weight—37 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels—3
Switch—Rotary / scroll wheel
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare