How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. M100F vs XT1A

Ansmann M100F vs Klarus XT1A

What M100F does better (0) and where XT1A wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Ansmann M100F
Ansmann · 2018M100F
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ $30
vs
Klarus XT1A
Klarus · 2018XT1A
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
2.6Brightness & throw4.5
2.1Battery & charging3.2
2.7Build & durability8.8
5.9Features5.9

Why is M100F better than XT1A?

M100F has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is XT1A better than M100F?

  1. Maximum output115 lm vs 1,000 lm8.7×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)70 m vs 182 m2.6×
  3. Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  4. Maximum runtime5 h vs 7 h+40%
  5. RechargeableNo · M100F: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Ansmann M100FAnsmann M100F≈ $303.7
Klarus XT1AKlarus XT1A≈ $355.9
Light output
Maximum output115 lm1,000 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)70 m182 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs11
Battery & charging
BatteryAA14500 Li-ion
Number of batteries11
Maximum runtime5 h7 h
RechargeableNoYes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Pocket clipYesYes
Size & weight
Length / height—108 mm
Head diameter / width—23 mm
Weight—62 g
Modes & features
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare