- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- M100F vs P2R Core
Ansmann M100F vs Ledlenser P2R Core
What M100F does better (1) and where P2R Core wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is M100F better than P2R Core?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)70 m vs 65 m+8%
Why is P2R Core better than M100F?
- RechargeableNo · M100F: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 115 lm | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 70 m | 65 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 5 h | 5 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 103 mm |
| Weight | — | 36 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
