- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- M1500F vs TAC 700
Ansmann M1500F vs Energizer TAC 700
What M1500F does better (2) and where TAC 700 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is M1500F better than TAC 700?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 100 m2.4×
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 700 lm2.1×
Why is TAC 700 better than M1500F?
TAC 700 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 700 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 240 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | CR123A |
| Number of batteries | 6 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 15 h | — |
| Rechargeable | No | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 120 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 31 mm |
| Weight | — | 147 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
