- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Wizard C2 Pro Max vs WF30RE Intrinsically Safe
Armytek Wizard C2 Pro Max vs Fenix WF30RE Intrinsically Safe
What Wizard C2 Pro Max does better (2) and where WF30RE Intrinsically Safe wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Brightness & throw2.8
2.2Battery & charging9.2
3.9Build & durability5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Wizard C2 Pro MaxWF30RE Intrinsically Safe
| Wizard C2 Pro Max | WF30RE Intrinsically Safe | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 121 mm | 150.5 mm | −29.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 34 mm | = |
| Weight | 79 g | 215 g | −136 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Wizard C2 Pro Max better than WF30RE Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output3,720 lm vs 280 lm13.3×
- Weight79 g vs 215 g2.7×
Why is WF30RE Intrinsically Safe better than Wizard C2 Pro Max?
- Maximum runtime3.2 h vs 120 h36.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)113 m vs 170 m+50%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,720 lm | 280 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 7,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 113 m | 170 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,800K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 3.2 h | 120 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 150.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 28 mm |
| Weight | 79 g | 215 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
