- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Wizard C2 WR vs HM50R V2.0
Armytek Wizard C2 WR vs Fenix HM50R V2.0
What Wizard C2 WR does better (2) and where HM50R V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Build & durability8.2
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Wizard C2 WRHM50R V2.0
| Wizard C2 WR | HM50R V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 112 mm | 64 mm | +48 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 33 mm | 36 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 78 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Wizard C2 WR better than HM50R V2.0?
- Submersible to10 m vs 2 m5×
- Weight65 g vs 78 g+20%
Why is HM50R V2.0 better than Wizard C2 WR?
HM50R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | — | 700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 115 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G3 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,900K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | — | 42 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 10 m | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 112 mm | 64 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 33 mm | 36 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 32 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 78 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
