- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 425 vs Actik Core
BioLite 425 vs Petzl Actik Core
What 425 does better (1) and where Actik Core wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Brightness & throw5.4
5.2Battery & charging5.0
4.3Build & durability8.3
Why is 425 better than Actik Core?
- Weight78 g vs 88 g+13%
Why is Actik Core better than 425?
- Maximum output425 lm vs 625 lm+47%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 100 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 425 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 115 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 78 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
