- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 425 vs 514652F
BioLite 425 vs Underwater Kinetics 514652F
What 425 does better (1) and where 514652F wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is 425 better than 514652F?
- Maximum output425 lm vs 170 lm2.5×
Why is 514652F better than 425?
514652F has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 425 lm | 170 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 192 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 4 |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 78 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Yellow, Black |
