How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,319 models · updated Nov 2, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Range 300 vs SWIFT LT

BioLite Range 300 vs Petzl SWIFT LT

What Range 300 does better (0) and where SWIFT LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BioLite Range 300
BioLite · 2026Range 300
4.1Score
0 advantages≈ $45
vs
Petzl SWIFT LT
Petzl · 2026SWIFT LT
4.9Score
1 advantage≈ $45
Higher score
3.8Brightness & throw3.6

Why is Range 300 better than SWIFT LT?

Range 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is SWIFT LT better than Range 300?

  1. Maximum output300 lm vs 380 lm+27%
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl SWIFT LTPetzl SWIFT LT≈ $454.9
Light output
Maximum output300 lm380 lm
Peak beam intensity—1,220 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—70 m
Runtime at maximum output—120 min
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
Battery—Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity—880 mAh
Maximum runtime—60 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Charging time—3 h
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
Submersible to1 m—
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Size & weight
Weight—43 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
ColoursGrey, White—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare