- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Range 400 vs Nao LT
BioLite Range 400 vs Petzl Nao LT
What Range 400 does better (0) and where Nao LT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Range 400 better than Nao LT?
Range 400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Nao LT better than Range 400?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 600 lm+50%
- Submersible to1 m vs 2 m2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1 m | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Grey, White | — |
