How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Astro 300-R vs Nao LT

Black Diamond Astro 300-R vs Petzl Nao LT

What Astro 300-R does better (1) and where Nao LT wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Black Diamond Astro 300-R
Black Diamond · 2022Astro 300-R
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
Petzl Nao LT
Petzl · 2026Nao LT
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
3.7Brightness & throw4.6
2.8Battery & charging5.1
2.6Build & durability8.2

Why is Astro 300-R better than Nao LT?

  1. Battery capacity1,500 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+20%

Why is Nao LT better than Astro 300-R?

  1. Maximum output300 lm vs 600 lm2×
  2. USB-C chargingNo · Astro 300-R: Yes
  3. Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl Nao LTPetzl Nao LT≈ $756.8
Light output
Maximum output300 lm600 lm
Peak beam intensity—1,410 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—75 m
Runtime at maximum output—120 min
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoAAA
Number of batteries—3
Battery capacity1,500 mAh1,250 mAh
Maximum runtime—85 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingNoYes
Charging time—3.5 h
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Size & weight
Weight—90 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
Motion / reactive sensor—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare