- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT 2500 vs HM61R V3.0
Blaser Active Outfits HT 2500 vs Fenix HM61R V3.0
What HT 2500 does better (1) and where HM61R V3.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Brightness & throw8.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is HT 2500 better than HM61R V3.0?
- Maximum output2,500 lm vs 1,800 lm+39%
Why is HM61R V3.0 better than HT 2500?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 195 m+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,500 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 9,510 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 195 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 300 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 105.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 38 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 51 mm |
| Weight | — | 168 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
