Brennenstuhl HL 2400 Akku vs Fenix WT26RM

What HL 2400 Akku does better (1) and where WT26RM wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Brennenstuhl · 2026HL 2400 Akku

9.7Score

1 advantage≈ $55

Higher score

Fenix · 2026WT26RM

8.7Score

1 advantage≈ $90

9.2Brightness & throw8.8

9.6Build & durability7.6

Why is HL 2400 Akku better than WT26RM?

Specifications

Only differences	Brennenstuhl HL 2400 Akku≈ $559.7	Fenix WT26RM≈ $908.7
Light output
Maximum output	2,400 lm	2,500 lm
Peak beam intensity	—	32,760 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)	—	362 m
Light source	COB LED panel	LED
LED & beam
Colour temperature	—	6,500K
Adjustable colour temperature	—	Yes
Battery & charging
Battery	Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po	21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity	—	5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime	—	69.3 h
Rechargeable	Yes	Yes
USB-C charging	—	Yes
Battery level indicator	—	Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating	—	IP66
Water protection (IPx)	—	IPx6
Body material	Plastic / polymer	—
Magnetic tail / base	—	Yes
Size & weight
Length / height	—	122 mm
Head diameter / width	—	56 mm
Body diameter / depth	—	40 mm
Weight	44 g	241 g
Modes & features
Switch	—	Rotary / scroll wheel
Red light	—	Yes
Lockout	—	Yes
Mode memory	—	Yes
Colours	Black	—