- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LuxPremium TL 600 AF vs Flash 600 R
Brennenstuhl LuxPremium TL 600 AF vs Scangrip Flash 600 R
What LuxPremium TL 600 AF does better (3) and where Flash 600 R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Brightness & throw6.0
7.0Build & durability6.1
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
LuxPremium TL 600 AFFlash 600 R
| LuxPremium TL 600 AF | Flash 600 R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 137 mm | 185 mm | −48 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 38 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 250 g | −50 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LuxPremium TL 600 AF better than Flash 600 R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)175 m vs 150 m+17%
- Maximum output630 lm vs 600 lm+5%
- Weight200 g vs 250 g+25%
Why is Flash 600 R better than LuxPremium TL 600 AF?
Flash 600 R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 630 lm | 600 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 175 m | 150 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 22 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 4 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 137 mm | 185 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 38 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 250 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Milwaukee IR PL250vsBrennenstuhl LuxPremium TL 600 AF7.58.1
vsScangrip Mag7vsBrennenstuhl LuxPremium TL 600 AF
vsMakita DEADML806vsBrennenstuhl LuxPremium TL 600 AF7.98.1
vsLuceco AkkuvsBrennenstuhl LuxPremium TL 600 AF8.58.1
vsAnsmann 1600-0394 FL2500R 30WvsBrennenstuhl LuxPremium TL 600 AFvs
Milwaukee IR PL250vsScangrip Flash 600 R7.56.5