- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- SL 400 AF vs iStar Natural
Brennenstuhl SL 400 AF vs Nextorch iStar Natural
What SL 400 AF does better (0) and where iStar Natural wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Brightness & throw4.4
2.5Build & durability4.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is SL 400 AF better than iStar Natural?
SL 400 AF has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is iStar Natural better than SL 400 AF?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 450 lm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 450 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,100 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 21 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 67 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 39 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 32 mm |
| Weight | — | 70 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Red | — |
