- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- de cou CT7100 vs Seeker 4 IPX8
Caterpillar de cou CT7100 vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
What de cou CT7100 does better (0) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Brightness & throw8.0
Why is de cou CT7100 better than Seeker 4 IPX8?
de cou CT7100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than de cou CT7100?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 3,100 lm15.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)30 m vs 400 m13.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 30 m | 400 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | No | No |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Stainless steel |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
