- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- XPH25R vs 514652F
Coast XPH25R vs Underwater Kinetics 514652F
What XPH25R does better (1) and where 514652F wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is XPH25R better than 514652F?
- Maximum output410 lm vs 170 lm2.4×
Why is 514652F better than XPH25R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)120 m vs 192 m+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 410 lm | 170 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 120 m | 192 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | CR123A | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 4 |
| Maximum runtime | 9 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 76 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Yellow, Black |
