- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- XPH34R vs Nao LT
Coast XPH34R vs Petzl Nao LT
What XPH34R does better (1) and where Nao LT wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is XPH34R better than Nao LT?
- Maximum output2,075 lm vs 600 lm3.5×
Why is Nao LT better than XPH34R?
Nao LT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,075 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
