How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Acid HPA1300 vs Nao RL

Cube Acid HPA1300 vs Petzl Nao RL

What Acid HPA1300 does better (0) and where Nao RL wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cube Acid HPA1300
Cube · 2022Acid HPA1300
6.8Score
0 advantages≈ $130
vs
Petzl Nao RL
Petzl · 2022Nao RL
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
8.5Brightness & throw8.7
2.5Battery & charging6.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is Acid HPA1300 better than Nao RL?

Acid HPA1300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Nao RL better than Acid HPA1300?

  1. Maximum runtime11 h vs 80 h7.3×
  2. Maximum output1,300 lm vs 1,500 lm+15%
  3. Weight192 g vs 145 g+32%
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl Nao RLPetzl Nao RL≈ $1208.4
Light output
Maximum output1,300 lm1,500 lm
Peak beam intensity—10,000 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—200 m
Runtime at maximum output—1,440 min
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery—Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity—3,200 mAh
Maximum runtime11 h80 h
Rechargeable—Yes
Charging time—3.5 h
Battery level indicatorYes—
Size & weight
Weight192 g145 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
SOS / beaconYes—
Red light—Yes
Motion / reactive sensor—Yes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare