- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- SSH-50 vs E301659800
Denver SSH-50 vs Energizer E301659800
What SSH-50 does better (2) and where E301659800 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Brightness & throw2.2
2.4Build & durability2.4
Why is SSH-50 better than E301659800?
- Maximum output300 lm vs 100 lm3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 40 m2.5×
Why is E301659800 better than SSH-50?
- Maximum runtime6 h vs 9 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 100 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 40 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 6 h | 9 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
