- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- SSH-50 vs Headfire 280 Sensor
Denver SSH-50 vs Kerbl Headfire 280 Sensor
What SSH-50 does better (2) and where Headfire 280 Sensor wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Brightness & throw5.4
2.7Battery & charging3.5
2.5Build & durability8.8
Why is SSH-50 better than Headfire 280 Sensor?
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 800 mAh+50%
- Maximum output300 lm vs 280 lm+7%
Why is Headfire 280 Sensor better than SSH-50?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 140 m+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 280 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 140 m |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 6 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
