- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Explorer LNT-200 vs Chameleon
Duracell Explorer LNT-200 vs Easy Camp Chameleon
What Explorer LNT-200 does better (1) and where Chameleon wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Brightness & throw4.2
6.3Battery & charging9.7
Why is Explorer LNT-200 better than Chameleon?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 220 lm+27%
Why is Chameleon better than Explorer LNT-200?
- Maximum runtime62 h vs 300 h4.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 220 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 13 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 16 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 62 h | 300 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 87 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 97 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 118 mm |
| Weight | — | 182 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Grey |
Related comparisons
vs
Black Diamond MojivsDuracell Explorer LNT-2004.95.5
vsLedlenser W1RvsDuracell Explorer LNT-2004.55.5
vsRobens Dunkery BeaconvsDuracell Explorer LNT-2006.35.5
vsMPOWERED Luci EMRGvsDuracell Explorer LNT-2006.05.5
vsBrunner Outdoor LyssvsDuracell Explorer LNT-2005.15.5
vs
Robens LighthousevsEasy Camp Chameleon7.69.0