- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe vs 450 Flex
EMOS Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe vs NEBO 450 Flex
What Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe does better (1) and where 450 Flex wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Brightness & throw4.3
4.9Build & durability9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe450 Flex
| Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe | 450 Flex | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 101 mm | 290 mm | −189 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 22 mm | 107 mm | −85 mm |
| Weight | 47 g | 99 g | −52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe better than 450 Flex?
- Weight47 g vs 99 g2.1×
Why is 450 Flex better than Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe?
- Maximum output170 lm vs 450 lm2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 237 m2.4×
- RechargeableNo · Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 170 lm | 450 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 237 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 2.5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 101 mm | 290 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 22 mm | 107 mm |
| Weight | 47 g | 99 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Ledlenser Kidbeam4 70vsEMOS Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe
vsAnsmann superhellvsEMOS Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe3.73.8
vsKS Tools Mobile Werkstatt-HandlampevsEMOS Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe3.93.8
vsHoto Tools FitvsEMOS Ultibright 60 Mini-Taschenlampe4.23.8vs
Ledlenser Kidbeam4 70vsNEBO 450 Flexvs
NEBO 450 FlexvsAnsmann WL450R slim