- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E301659800 vs COB 110
Energizer E301659800 vs Hama COB 110
What E301659800 does better (1) and where COB 110 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
2.3Brightness & throw2.2
Why is E301659800 better than COB 110?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)40 m vs 15 m2.7×
Why is COB 110 better than E301659800?
- Maximum output100 lm vs 110 lm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 110 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 40 m | 15 m |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 9 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 58 mm |
| Weight | — | 45 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
