How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E301659800 vs 150 lm 887930413861

Energizer E301659800 vs Kodak 150 lm 887930413861

What E301659800 does better (0) and where 150 lm 887930413861 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Energizer E301659800
Energizer · 2021E301659800
3.5Score
0 advantages≈ $7
Higher score
vs
Kodak 150 lm 887930413861
Kodak · 2025150 lm 887930413861
1 advantage≈ $8
2.2Brightness & throw2.4

Why is E301659800 better than 150 lm 887930413861?

E301659800 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is 150 lm 887930413861 better than E301659800?

  1. Maximum output100 lm vs 150 lm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output100 lm150 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)40 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
Number of batteries—3
Maximum runtime9 h—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4—
Body materialPlastic / polymerPlastic / polymer
Modes & features
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare