- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E301659800 vs wiederaufladbar
Energizer E301659800 vs Mil Tec wiederaufladbar
What E301659800 does better (1) and where wiederaufladbar wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Brightness & throw2.2
2.4Build & durability8.8
Why is E301659800 better than wiederaufladbar?
- Maximum output100 lm vs 80 lm+25%
Why is wiederaufladbar better than E301659800?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 80 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 40 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Maximum runtime | 9 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 200 mm |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
