- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- BC26R-D vs TA30C
Fenix BC26R-D vs Nextorch TA30C
What BC26R-D does better (1) and where TA30C wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
BC26R-DTA30C
| BC26R-D | TA30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 113 mm | 136 mm | −23 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 30 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 97 g | +58 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BC26R-D better than TA30C?
- Battery capacity21,700 mAh vs 2,600 mAh8.3×
Why is TA30C better than BC26R-D?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)169 m vs 303 m+79%
- Weight155 g vs 97 g+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 22,950 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 169 m | 303 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 21,700 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 113 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
