- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- BC26R-D vs MH25 V2.0
Fenix BC26R-D vs Nitecore MH25 V2.0
What BC26R-D does better (1) and where MH25 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
BC26R-DMH25 V2.0
| BC26R-D | MH25 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 113 mm | 157 mm | −44 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 40 mm | −11 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 137 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BC26R-D better than MH25 V2.0?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,300 lm+23%
Why is MH25 V2.0 better than BC26R-D?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)169 m vs 475 m2.8×
- Weight155 g vs 137 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 169 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XM-L |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 21,700 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | — | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 113 mm | 157 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 40 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 137 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
