How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. C7 V2.0 vs FlatTac X2

Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Klarus FlatTac X2

What C7 V2.0 does better (2) and where FlatTac X2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix C7 V2.0
Fenix · 2026C7 V2.0
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Klarus FlatTac X2
Klarus · 2026FlatTac X2
0 advantages≈ $50
8.3Brightness & throw7.3

Why is C7 V2.0 better than FlatTac X2?

  1. Maximum output3,300 lm vs 3,000 lm+10%
  2. RechargeableYes · FlatTac X2: No

Why is FlatTac X2 better than C7 V2.0?

FlatTac X2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix C7 V2.0Fenix C7 V2.0≈ $808.2
Light output
Maximum output3,300 lm3,000 lm
Peak beam intensity82,660 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-70—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K3,000K
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Maximum runtime79 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Body materialAluminiumStainless steel
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height150.6 mm—
Head diameter / width40 mm—
Body diameter / depth27.5 mm—
Weight256 g—
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare