- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- C7 V2.0 vs TrailSight
Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Nitecore TrailSight
What C7 V2.0 does better (4) and where TrailSight wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw7.0
6.7Battery & charging4.8
5.2Build & durability5.3
Why is C7 V2.0 better than TrailSight?
- Maximum output3,300 lm vs 1,200 lm2.8×
- Maximum runtime79 h vs 46 h+72%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m vs 530 m+8%
- Peak beam intensity82,660 cd vs 70,347 cd+18%
Why is TrailSight better than C7 V2.0?
- Weight256 g vs 121 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,300 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 82,660 cd | 70,347 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 575 m | 530 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | NiteLab |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 79 h | 46 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Magnesium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150.6 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 256 g | 121 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
