- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E01 V2.0 vs E02R
Fenix E01 V2.0 vs Fenix E02R
What E01 V2.0 does better (2) and where E02R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E01 V2.0E02R
| E01 V2.0 | E02R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 48 mm | +18.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 15 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | 14 mm | = |
| Weight | 13 g | 15 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E01 V2.0 better than E02R?
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 6.5 h3.8×
- Weight13 g vs 15 g+15%
Why is E02R better than E01 V2.0?
- Maximum output100 lm vs 200 lm2×
- Peak beam intensity310 cd vs 600 cd+94%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 49 m+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 310 cd | 600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 49 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 120 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 6.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 48 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 15 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 2 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
