- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E01 V2.0 vs K6R roségold
Fenix E01 V2.0 vs Ledlenser K6R roségold
What E01 V2.0 does better (3) and where K6R roségold wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Brightness & throw6.3
5.1Battery & charging2.5
9.7Build & durability3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
E01 V2.0K6R roségold
| E01 V2.0 | K6R roségold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 66 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 30 mm | −15 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 32 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E01 V2.0 better than K6R roségold?
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 8 h3.1×
- Weight13 g vs 32 g2.5×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is K6R roségold better than E01 V2.0?
- Maximum output100 lm vs 400 lm4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 80 m2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 310 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 8 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 66 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | — |
| Weight | 13 g | 32 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
