- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E01 V2.0 vs TIKI
Fenix E01 V2.0 vs Nitecore TIKI
What E01 V2.0 does better (1) and where TIKI wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E01 V2.0TIKI
| E01 V2.0 | TIKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 56.5 mm | +10 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 15 mm | = |
| Weight | 13 g | 12 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E01 V2.0 better than TIKI?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is TIKI better than E01 V2.0?
- Maximum output100 lm vs 300 lm3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 71 m2×
- Peak beam intensity310 cd vs 1,260 cd4.1×
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 40 h+60%
- Weight13 g vs 12 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 310 cd | 1,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 71 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Osram P8 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Osram |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 130 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 40 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 56.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | — |
| Weight | 13 g | 12 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Grey |
