- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E02R vs Thumb
Fenix E02R vs Nitecore Thumb
What E02R does better (4) and where Thumb wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E02RThumb
| E02R | Thumb | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 48 mm | 74 mm | −26 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 24 mm | −9 mm |
| Weight | 15 g | 25 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E02R better than Thumb?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 85 lm2.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)49 m vs 26 m+88%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Weight15 g vs 25 g+67%
Why is Thumb better than E02R?
- Maximum runtime6.5 h vs 22 h3.4×
- USB-C chargingNo · E02R: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 600 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 49 m | 26 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 120 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 6.5 h | 22 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 48 mm | 74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | — |
| Weight | 15 g | 25 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 2 | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
