- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs E05R
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Fenix E05R
What E03R V2.0 does better (5) and where E05R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03R V2.0E05R
| E03R V2.0 | E05R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 68 mm | −15.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 15.3 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 15 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 24 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R V2.0 better than E05R?
- USB-C chargingYes · E05R: No
- Peak beam intensity2,020 cd vs 1,020 cd+98%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 64 m+41%
- Maximum output500 lm vs 400 lm+25%
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 320 mAh+25%
Why is E05R better than E03R V2.0?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Weight30 g vs 24 g+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | 1,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | 64 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 320 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 68 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 15.3 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 24 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | — | Side switch |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
