How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E03R V2.0 vs Slim

Fenix E03R V2.0 vs NEBO Slim

What E03R V2.0 does better (4) and where Slim wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E03R V2.0
Fenix · 2023E03R V2.0
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
NEBO Slim
NEBO · 2025Slim
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $25
7.1Brightness & throw5.6
8.2Battery & charging5.5
5.1Build & durability3.0

Why is E03R V2.0 better than Slim?

  1. Maximum output500 lm vs 250 lm2×
  2. Maximum runtime30 h vs 10 h3×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 67 m+34%
  4. Weight30 g vs 34 g+13%

Why is Slim better than E03R V2.0?

  1. Battery capacity400 mAh vs 450 mAh+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E03R V2.0Fenix E03R V2.0≈ $307.6
NEBO SlimNEBO Slim≈ $254.3
Light output
Maximum output500 lm250 lm
Peak beam intensity2,020 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m67 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs2—
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity400 mAh450 mAh
Maximum runtime30 h10 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Charging time—2 h
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66—
Water protection (IPx)IPx6—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height52.5 mm103 mm
Head diameter / width26 mm—
Body diameter / depth13 mm—
Weight30 g34 g
Modes & features
Red lightYes—
Green / blue / RGB lightYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Grey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare