- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs K3 V2.0
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Nextorch K3 V2.0
What E03R V2.0 does better (4) and where K3 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03R V2.0K3 V2.0
| E03R V2.0 | K3 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 150 mm | −97.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 14 mm | +12 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 12 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 28 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R V2.0 better than K3 V2.0?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 250 lm2×
- Peak beam intensity2,020 cd vs 900 cd2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 60 m+50%
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 20 h+50%
Why is K3 V2.0 better than E03R V2.0?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
- Weight30 g vs 28 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 250 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | 900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | 60 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 14 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 12 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 28 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
