- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs UT21
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Nextorch UT21
What E03R V2.0 does better (4) and where UT21 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03R V2.0UT21
| E03R V2.0 | UT21 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 72.4 mm | −19.9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 50 mm | −24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 38.4 mm | −25.4 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 85 g | −55 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R V2.0 better than UT21?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 11 lm45.5×
- Weight30 g vs 85 g2.8×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 25 h+20%
Why is UT21 better than E03R V2.0?
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 640 mAh+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 11 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 22 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 640 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 50 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 38.4 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 85 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
